Rev. James D. Conley, D.D., S.T.L. | Diocese of Lincoln website

In a recent query addressed to the Register, a reader sought to unravel the mystery surrounding the absence of last names in biblical accounts. Speaker A elucidates that the figures in the Bible did not possess last names as commonly understood today. The concept of surnames was introduced much later in history to differentiate individuals with similar given names.

Speaker A delves into the intricate ways individuals were distinguished in biblical times, citing examples such as Simon/Peter being identified with the Aramaic word 'bar' to specify his lineage. The use of additional descriptors to differentiate between individuals with common names like Mary and Joseph further exemplifies the unique naming conventions of the time.

The Old Testament presents an even more intriguing landscape, where names were crafted from entire phrases or sentences to encapsulate a person's life story or emphasize their role. Speaker A draws parallels to the practice of naming in Native American culture, highlighting the early adoption of this practice by biblical characters.

Furthermore, the inclusion of genealogies in the Bible serves a crucial purpose in aiding readers to trace the lineage and background of lesser-known characters. Speaker A emphasizes the importance of cross-referencing names and details across various texts to unravel deeper meanings and insights into God's ways.

As Speaker A aptly concludes, a profound understanding of biblical narratives necessitates attention to even the minutest details, leading to a richer comprehension of the overarching themes and messages woven throughout the scriptures.